The Galley

See what your students get, and why it lands.

No mockups. Every page below is real, pulled straight from the files you download. Tap any one to see it full size.

Your students are not answering questions. They are making a call.

This is a real case day from the student files. Your students sit as the editor of record at Loose Leaf magazine, holding a contested longform feature called "Stocked Without Compromise: The Long Reckoning at Marrow Books." The prose is propulsive. The evidence underneath it is uneven. On the page in front of them are Sasha Petrov's polished narrative, on-record letters from former employees Tomlin and Cho, a fact-check return, and a legal threat from the owner's counsel. There is no comprehension worksheet here. Your students have to decide what each source actually proves, whose framing is doing the argumentative work, and whether the file can carry the claim. They read inside the file, not above it, and the decision is theirs.

Tap to see a real case day

They are graded on their reasoning, not on getting it right.

Your students are not scored on whether they run the story or kill it. They are scored on the rigor and honesty of the path they took to the decision. The Daily Rubric carries 24 points and looks at evidence use, depth of analysis, and what we call world authenticity, the discipline of reading from inside the editor's chair rather than reaching for a clever take. A sound process behind a wrong call beats a lucky guess every time. To reach the top band, a student has to write a falsification condition that could actually be tested, naming the specific document that would change their mind, not a vague promise to reconsider later. The rubric rewards the careful path and refuses to reward bluffing.

Tap to read the grading rubric

Let the workbook hold the busywork so judgment gets the energy.

The Tracker carries the record so your students do not have to. It holds every source in the file, tags each one against the six-tier evidence hierarchy, and follows tier movement as the case develops. A claim that starts as a social media thread at the bottom tier can climb when an on-record letter arrives, then climb again when a second source corroborates it. The spreadsheet keeps the day count, the confidence ratings, and the running notes in one place, so your students are not copying source names or hunting for what they wrote on Day 2. Their energy goes where it matters, into weighing what each piece of evidence is worth and noticing when their own read is drifting ahead of the file.

Tap to see the tracker

Every day is already scripted. You bring the facilitation.

The Teacher Guide runs each session to the minute and fits a standard 50-minute period. Every day follows the same clear arc: a short opening to surface what your students arrived with, a stretch where the new artifact lands and gets examined, a discussion block where they defend or revise their reading out loud, and a closing workbook entry that produces the day's written record. The guide tells you what to say, what to hand out, where students predictably stumble, and how to steer the conversation without giving the answer away. You do not build any of it. You bring the facilitation and the room, the simulation brings the case, the timing, and the script. Prep stays light.

Tap to read the teacher guide

The lesson plan is already written.

Every simulation comes with a fully editable, admin-ready lesson plan. Standards alignment, daily pacing, learning objectives, differentiation, and an assessment plan are already done, so you can hand it to an administrator or adapt it to your district template in minutes.

Tap to preview the lesson plan

The day the better-written version turns out to be the thinner one.

By Day 4, your student has a theory. Sasha Petrov writes with such authority that the case feels settled: Marrow Books kept an exclusion list, the owner gatekept who got shelf space, and the feature is ready to run. Then the former employees' letters land. Tomlin and Cho both go on record, but their tenures never overlapped, and the corroboration the student expected is not clean. The fact-check return comes back next, fourteen claims confirmed and fourteen flagged with problems. The student had been reading the loud parts as the strong parts. The annotated problems pull harder than the quiet confirmations, and the theory that felt airtight an hour ago starts to show its seams.

Now the student has to choose. The propulsive narrative is still the easiest thing to believe, and protecting it means explaining the contradictions away. Trusting the evidence means slowing down, separating Petrov's polish from what the record actually establishes, and admitting the file does not yet carry the claim the way it is written. When the student stops defending the theory and starts weighing the tiers, the case reorganizes. The strongest sentences were never the strongest evidence. What the file proves and what it merely asserts finally pull apart, and the student can see the difference.

Editor of record at Loose Leaf magazine.

Your students take the chair of the editor of record at Loose Leaf magazine. On their desk is a contested longform feature, "Stocked Without Compromise: The Long Reckoning at Marrow Books," investigating a beloved bookstore and its owner of 41 years, Ezra Whitfield. The file holds the writer's voice-driven narrative, on-record testimony from former employees, a fact-check return, and a legal threat from the owner's counsel. Your students are custodians of that file, responsible for its integrity, and they owe a final decision: what does the magazine publish, and on whose evidence.

Engineering better thinkers.

Discernment matters here because the file rewards the wrong instinct. The most persuasive prose sits on the thinnest evidence, so each day pairs a predictable bias with the capacity that defeats it, training your students to weigh what kind of evidence a source is before deciding what it says.

13 days of evidence under deadline.

The early days set the file in front of your students and force a first read they have to own. From there the cascade builds: testimony arrives, the fact-check returns, two binding decisions land, and the case reorganizes. The final days turn the lens back on the students' own thinking and name what they have been doing all along.

Standards alignment.

The Galley targets the core of the Grade 10 reading and writing standards. Students cite strong textual evidence and weigh what the file supports under CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.9-10.1, evaluate an author's argument and the sufficiency of evidence under RI.9-10.8, and analyze how Petrov's word choice and structure shape meaning and tone under RI.9-10.4 and RI.9-10.5. The daily workbook and final letter build argument writing under W.9-10.1, where students support a claim with reasoning and relevant evidence and acknowledge counterclaims. Daily discourse develops collaborative reasoning under SL.9-10.1, and close attention to the writer's framing supports language analysis under L.9-10.3.

Turnkey, classroom-ready.