The Cut

See what your students get, and why it lands.

No mockups. Every page below is real, pulled straight from the files you download. Tap any one to see it full size.

Your students are not answering questions. They are making the call.

On this case day, the team inherits 67 hours of raw footage from a documentary filmmaker who has walked off the project. The commissioning editor wants 28 minutes by deadline. Your students are the Editor of Record. They sit with interview transcripts, a contested engineering report, and the director's original elegy for a closing neighborhood pool, and they have to bind to one frame: Elegy, Accountability, or Generational Story. Nothing on the page tells them which is correct. The footage points in three directions at once, and the team has to weigh evidence against intent and commit. This is a real editorial call with a deadline behind it, not a worksheet with a key.

Tap to see a real case day

A sound process behind a wrong cut beats a lucky guess.

The Daily Team Rubric grades what the team did with the evidence, not whether they landed on the frame you would have chosen. It scores Evidence Use, Analysis Depth, Critical Thinking, and World Authenticity across every session. The simulation calls this the Boring Choice Wins mandate. A team that builds a rough string-out early, runs the Day 7 test screening with genuine openness, and re-reads its Day 1 log against its Day 5 commitment will out-score a team that locked into a strong reading on Day 2 and spent two weeks defending it. Reasoning that updates when the record demands it is the thing being measured, and students can see exactly where the points live.

Tap to read the grading rubric

Let the tracker hold the busywork so judgment gets the energy.

Editing 67 hours of footage by hand would bury your students in logging before they reached a single decision. The Tracker carries that load. It holds the footage index, the running interview log, and the Evidence Hierarchy that ranks every source by epistemic weight, from the documentary record at Tier 1 down to the director's shooting notes at Tier 6. The Team Decision Log captures each binding commitment with a timestamp, so the team can quote its own past calls during the Day 10 drift audit. When a researcher needs to know whether a claim rests on the engineering report or on a stakeholder's memory, the answer is one row away. The spreadsheet manages the record so students can argue about what it means.

Tap to see the tracker

Every day is already scripted. You bring the facilitation.

The Teacher Guide paces all 14 days for a standard 50-minute period. The DIIE rhythm of diagnosis, intervention, implementation, and evaluation is built straight into the block timestamps, so there is no separate footer to track and no second document to juggle. Mandatory Touch Points tell you exactly when to pause the room and name a bias dynamic. The Bias Watch system gives you observable signals for groupthink and sunk cost so you know when to redirect a team that is settling too fast. The contradictions, the inflection days, and the deadline are all engineered into the materials. You facilitate the conversation. The simulation brings the case, the evidence, and the pressure.

Tap to read the teacher guide

The lesson plan is already written.

Every simulation comes with a fully editable, admin-ready lesson plan. Standards alignment, daily pacing, learning objectives, differentiation, and an assessment plan are already done, so you can hand it to an administrator or adapt it to your district template in minutes.

Tap to preview the lesson plan

The day the record outweighs the director.

Aaliyah's team had been calling it an elegy since Day 2. Maya Chen, the filmmaker who shot the footage, framed Belmont Pool as a loss, a 70-year-old public space mourned by the neighborhood that was losing it. The cut felt right. The interviews were warm, the music swelled, and the room agreed. Then the researcher pulled the Korhonen Engineering Report up the evidence hierarchy and read it out loud. The structure was failing. The closure was not only a civic betrayal. It was, in part, a documented safety call, and the budget records complicated the villain the elegy needed.

Aaliyah felt the cut she loved start to come apart. She could keep the elegy and bury the report at the bottom of the tier list where Maya had left it. She could trust the Tier 1 record over the director's intent and rebuild the frame around what the footage actually supported. The team chose the record. The new cut was harder to make and less comfortable to watch, and it was defensible. Once they stopped protecting Maya's frame, they could finally see which scenes had been carrying sentiment instead of evidence.

Last Summer at Belmont Pool, 67 hours and a 28-minute deadline.

Your students join WaterMark Docs as the editorial team of record on an unfinished documentary. Filmmaker Maya Chen has left the project, handing over 67 hours of raw footage about the closure of a 70-year-old pool in Belmont Heights, a low-income neighborhood. Commissioning editor Henrietta Faulks mandates a 28-minute cut for an early-2026 streaming release. Working as Picture Editor, Story Lead, Researcher, and Post Supervisor, students decide whether to inherit Chen's frame or build a new one from the documentary record.

Engineering better thinkers.

In a media landscape that rewards the loud, reactive cut, The Cut rewards the methodical one. Each case day pairs a named bias with the capacity that defeats it, so students feel the trap before they learn its name on Day 13. Discernment is the whole job of an editor of record.

14 days from acquisition to a locked cut.

The opening days build the team's command of the footage and the evidence hierarchy before any frame is bound. From Day 5 forward the case becomes a cascade, where each binding commitment narrows the next, mirroring a real edit from rough assembly to picture lock and a defensible memo.

Standards alignment.

The Cut targets the Grade 10 ELA anchor standards through authentic editorial work. Students cite strong textual and documentary evidence and weigh source reliability under CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.9-10.1 and RI.9-10.8, evaluating the engineering report, civic budget records, and interviews as competing claims. The Locked-Cut Memo builds a defensible argument with clear reasoning under W.9-10.1, and the Final Reflection draws on W.9-10.9. Rotating-role teamwork and the test screening exercise SL.9-10.1, while the cross-film transfer to The Act of Killing analyzes how structure and frame shape an argument under RI.9-10.5 and RI.9-10.6.

Turnkey, classroom-ready.